Platform Banner

What is a well-resolved conflict? Tutorial

Unlock the secrets to effective conflict resolution with 'What is a Well-Resolved Conflict?' Discover the four essential criteria for assessing resolution success: satisfaction, relationship quality, long-term stability, and cost-effectiveness. Learn how to turn disagreements into opportunities for growth in communication and relationships. Don't miss out on mastering these valuable strategies!

05:31
219 views
Parteger

Selected for you
New

Available in SoftSkills

00:00:08

We are about to see the 4 criteria that indicate a good conflict resolution,

00:00:13

the four criteria that make us say,

00:00:15

OK,

00:00:16

all's well that ends well,

00:00:18

the degree of satisfaction,

00:00:20

the quality of the relationship at the end of the resolution,

00:00:23

the long term effectiveness of the solution,

00:00:26

and the final cost of the conflict.

00:00:29

The first criterion is based on the degree of satisfaction of the parties.

00:00:35

Are they satisfied with the proposed solution?

00:00:38

The more the people concerned will have found their own solution,

00:00:43

even if a mediator was present,

00:00:46

the more likely they will be satisfied with it.

00:00:49

Agreeing on a common vision

00:00:52

on a common solution guarantees the success of the conflict resolution.

00:00:59

A win-win situation is of course ideal in the co-construction of the solution.

00:01:06

Compromise on the other hand,

00:01:08

Represents a lower level of conflict resolution,

00:01:12

but it is often satisfactory for those who are trying to get

00:01:15

out of the conflict and are unable to agree on a vision.

00:01:20

Compromising makes it possible to move forward

00:01:23

even if everyone remains in a black and white logic.

00:01:27

I am right.

00:01:28

They are wrong,

00:01:29

convinced that they deserved more.

00:01:32

Finally,

00:01:33

when an arbitrator decides,

00:01:34

be it a third party,

00:01:36

a manager,

00:01:36

a judge,

00:01:37

it also brings satisfaction when the conflict persists.

00:01:41

Yes,

00:01:42

it is better for an outside arbitrator to decide when everyone

00:01:46

recognizes that prolonging the conflict is more harmful to everyone,

00:01:50

more harmful than an unsatisfactory resolution

00:01:54

decided by a third party.

00:01:57

The second criterion of conflict management effectiveness

00:02:00

focuses on the quality of the party's relationship

00:02:05

post-conflict.

00:02:06

Have the participants restored their relationship to the

00:02:10

point where they can talk to each other

00:02:12

politely and respectively without resentment?

00:02:15

Will the parties be able to continue working together in trust?

00:02:20

Has the resolution of the conflict allowed them to get to know each other better?

00:02:25

To understand each other better

00:02:27

to the point

00:02:28

where they will be able to manage the next

00:02:31

disagreements as adults.

00:02:34

A professional relationship

00:02:36

just like a couple

00:02:38

can grow through effective conflict resolution.

00:02:43

If the participants can no longer collaborate,

00:02:46

then the conflict resolution has not been optimal.

00:02:49

The third criterion is the sustainability of the conflict resolution over time.

00:02:55

Will the solution allow for stability in the short,

00:02:59

medium and long term?

00:03:01

Is there a risk of conflict resurgence?

00:03:05

Either because a participant is not really satisfied

00:03:08

or because the resolution lacked the necessary level of insight,

00:03:14

this is why it is sometimes necessary to propose

00:03:17

a short-term solution and establish a long term agreement.

00:03:23

If Tess and Tom,

00:03:25

for example,

00:03:26

are in conflict over the management of the file,

00:03:29

the short term solution will be to decide how to manage that file,

00:03:35

and the long term solution will be to decide how to manage

00:03:39

any difference of opinion on the management of future joint files,

00:03:45

a new decision making process,

00:03:47

clarity on each one's roles and responsibilities,

00:03:50

and so on.

00:03:52

Indeed,

00:03:53

if the conflict arose around one joint file,

00:03:57

the problem will most likely reappear on another joint file

00:04:01

unless the organization roles and responsibilities have been clearly redefined

00:04:07

or unless Tom and Tess no longer have any files in common.

00:04:12

Finally,

00:04:14

you will be able to say that the management of a conflict has been optimal

00:04:18

if its resolution has not been too costly,

00:04:22

either costly in energy

00:04:24

to the point that the parties are exhausted

00:04:27

and will take time to regain their effectiveness.

00:04:30

Or costly in terms of work atmosphere if the whole team was impacted and stressed

00:04:38

or

00:04:39

time consuming because production was slowed down for everyone

00:04:44

costly in motivation or money or.

00:04:48

The longer a conflict lasts and the more emotional it is,

00:04:52

the more it will cost.

00:04:54

The costlier it is,

00:04:56

the longer the recovery period

00:04:58

after the conflict will be

00:05:01

before

00:05:02

wellbeing and performance is restored.

00:05:05

In conclusion,

00:05:07

what is good conflict resolution?

00:05:11

It is giving importance to the satisfaction of the people involved.

00:05:17

Preserving the quality of the relationships between everyone.

00:05:21

Sustaining the long term effectiveness of the solution

00:05:25

and minimizing the final cost of

00:05:29

the conflict.

Mandarine AI: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW